俄罗斯动力诊断公司
培训中心
金属磁记忆检测法
 
 

金属磁记忆检测法

金属磁记忆检测法标准

金属磁记忆常见问题解答

金属磁记忆论文

A.A. Dubov
金属磁记忆检测法

A.A. Dubov, V.T. Vlasov
基于设备风险和设备寿命评估的全新无损检测方法

V.T. Vlasov, A.A. Dubov
材料和结构件应力应变状态评估的物理标准

A.A. Dubov
金属磁记忆检测法的物理特征与检测工具和现有磁粉无损检测方法的比较

A.A. Dubov
金属磁记忆检测在俄罗斯和其他国家工业上的应用

A.A. Dubov, V.T. Vlasov
结构复杂构件材料的应力应变状态特征测量,应力应变状态诊断的能量概念

A.A. Dubov
老旧设备剩余寿命评估问题

A.A. Dubov
使用金属磁记忆法评估设备寿命

A.A. Dubov, I.I. Veliulin
基于现代工程诊断方法的油气管线的剩余寿命评估

A.A. Dubov, M.Yu. Evdokimov, A.V. Pavlov
扫描装置应用于快速在线检测输气管线的经验

A.A. Dubov, S.M. Kolokolnikov
回顾焊缝问题和相关程序以及使用金属磁记忆法的解决方案

 
 
 

The Metal Magnetic Memory Method -
a New Trend in Engineering Diagnostics

Traditional methods and means of diagnostics (ultrasonic inspection, magnetic particle inspection, X-ray) are oriented to detecting the already developed defects and by their designation can not prevent sudden fatigue damages of equipment, which are the main reasons of failures and sources of maintenance staff traumatism.

It is known that stress concentration (SC) zones, in which corrosion, fatigue and creep processes develop most intensively, are the main sources of damages occurrence in operating structures. Consequently, detecting SC zones is one of the most important tasks of equipment and structures diagnostics.

Variations of metal properties (corrosion, fatigue, creep) in SC zones are the processes preceding operating damaging. Metal magnetization, reflecting the actual stress-strained state of pipelines, equipment and structures, changes accordingly.

At present a principally new method of equipment and structures diagnostics based on using of metal magnetic memory has been developed and implemented successfully in practice. The MMM method unites the potential opportunities of non-destructive testing (NDT) and fracture mechanics due to which it has a number of significant advantages over other methods at inspection of industrial objects.

Basic practical advantages of the new diagnostics method as compared to the known magnetic and other traditional methods of non-destructive testing (NDT) are:

  • application of the method does not require special magnetizing devices as the phenomenon of equipment and structures units magnetization in the process of their operation is used;

  • locations of stress concentration due to working loads, which are unknown beforehand, are determined in the course of their inspection;

  • metal dressing or any other preparation of the test surface is not required;

  • small-sized instruments, self-contained power supply, recording systems and a memory unit up to 32 Mb are used to perform inspection by the proposed method;

  • special scanning devices allow testing of pipelines, vessels and equipment in the express-control mode at a speed of 100 m/hr and more.

The MMM method is the most suitable practical NDT method at assessment of actual stress-strained state. Therefore application of the new diagnostics method is the most effective for equipment units life assessment.

The suggested diagnostic method, based on application of metal magnetic memory, allows performing an integral evaluation of a unit state considering the metal quality, actual operating conditions and its structural features.

The main task of the MMM method is detecting on the test object of the most dangerous sections and units characterized by SC zones. Then, using, for example, UT in SC zones, the presence of a specific defect is detected. Based on calibration strength calculations of the most stressed units, detected by the MMM method, the equipment actual life assessment is carried out.

Besides that, MMM and the appropriate inspection devices allow:

  • carrying out early diagnostics of fatigue damages and predicting equipment reliability;

  • documenting inspection results and making the equipment state data bank;

  • performing express grading of new and old parts by their susceptibility to damaging;

  • detecting the future crack location and propagation direction on the test object with accuracy up to 1 mm as well as recording of the already formed cracks;

  • inspecting in some cases of pipelines and vessels without insulation removal.

What is principally new in the suggested inspection method?

From the analysis of known magnetic methods the following obligatory conditions of their application are arise. Firstly, the magnetizing devices should be necessarily used, and secondly, the known magnetic methods can be applied effectively only on condition that locations of stress concentration and defects in the control object are known in advance. Besides, the known magnetic inspection methods require, as a rule, metal dressing and other preparatory operations. It is obvious that application of conventional magnetic inspection methods in extended structures and on equipment at such conditions is practically impossible. For example, the task of specially magnetizing the tube system, whose length on a modern power boiler approaches 500 km, is unreal. It is impossible to know in advance stress concentration zones (the main sources of damages development) on each boiler tube due to different process, design and operating factors influencing their formation.

It is known at the same time that most of metal structures and equipment of ferromagnetic materials is susceptible to "self-magnetization" in the magnetic field of the Earth under influence of working loads.

The figure shows the scheme of magneto-elastic effect action (ΔBr - residual induction's change; Δσ - cyclic load's change; Нe - external magnetic field). If a cyclic load σ acts in some area of a structure and an external field is present (for example, the magnetic field of the Earth), the residual induction and residual magnetization growth occurs in this area.

Fig.1. The scheme of magneto-elastic effect action.

The phenomenon of equipment and structures "self-magnetization" is fought against everywhere (shipbuilding, power engineering, ball bearing and other industries). Upon studying this magnetization phenomenon on the example of boiler tubes, it was suggested for the first time to use it for the purposes of engineering diagnostics. At equipment and structures "self-magnetization" various magnetostriction effects appear. However, the new inspection method uses an aftereffect (in all varieties of magnetostriction effects), which becomes apparent as the metal magnetic memory to actual strains and structural changes in equipment metal. The more detailed information on the principal differences of the MMM method from other known magnetic NDT methods can be found in a A. A. Dubov "Principal Features of the Metal Magnetic Memory Method and Inspection Tools as Compared to Known Magnetic NDT methods".

Metal magnetic memory is an aftereffect, which becomes apparent in the form of residual magnetization of products and welded joints metal formed in the course of their fabrication and cooling in a weak magnetic field or in the form of irreversible changing of products magnetization in stress concentration and damaging zones due to working loads.

Note: A weak magnetic field is a geomagnetic field and other low-intensity external fields. The more clear boundary between weak and strong magnetic fields is considered in the book "The Physical Bases of the Metal Magnetic Memory Method" by Vlasov V.T., Dubov A.A. M.: ZAO "TISSO", 2004.

The metal magnetic memory method is a non-destructive testing method based on registration and analysis of self-magnetic leakage fields (SMLF) distribution on products surface for determination of stress concentration zones, defects, metal and welded joints structure inhomogeneity.

The self-magnetic leakage field of a product is a magnetic leakage field occurring on the product surface in the zones of dislocations stable slipbands under the influence of operational or residual stresses or in zones of maximum inhomogeneity of metal structure in new products.

For individual items, products and welded joints MMM is based on registration of own leakage magnetic fields occurring in residual stress concentration zones after their fabrication and cooling in the magnetic field of the Earth. During fabrication of any ferromagnetic products (fusion, forging, heat and mechanical treatment) the mechanism of real magnetic texture formation takes place simultaneously with solidification at cooling, as a rule, in the magnetic field of the Earth. In areas of the maximum lattice defects concentration (for example, dislocation clusters) and structural inhomogeneities domain boundaries occur with exit to the product surface in the form of SMLF normal component sign alternation lines. These lines correspond to the part section with the maximum magnetic resistance and characterize the maximum metal structure inhomogeneity zone and, accordingly, the internal stresses maximum concentration zone (SCZs).

Currently more than 40 guidance documents and inspection techniques has been developed and practically applied in power engineering, chemical, petrochemical, oil- and gas-refining, oil, gas and other Russian industries. The complex of researches for theoretical substantiation of the method is conducted jointly with a number of Russian institutes. The quantitative and qualitative criteria allowing performing early diagnostics of equipment fatigue damages and life assessment using the MMM method are developed.

During the period from1990 to 2008 the experts of Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd carried out industrial researches with a state assessment of more than 310 steam and hot-water boilers, more than 220 steam and gas turbines, more than 200 vessels and apparatuses, more than 500 km of various process purpose pipelines; the quality inspection of machine-building products at more than 50 plants and companies both in Russia and other countries is carried out; experimental control of a rails and wheel sets on railway transport enterprises, bridge structures, hoisting mechanisms and other technical objects is performed.

Based on the results of 2008, diagnostic companies and organizations, which bought instruments and passed training at "Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd" Certification Center, applied the MMM method at equipment diagnostics at more than 1000 enterprises of Russia. Besides Russia, the method was implemented at a number of enterprises of 25 countries: Argentina, Angola, Australia, Bulgaria, Byelorussia, Canada, China, Finland, Germany, India, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Poland, Serbia, South Korea, Ukraine, USA. 

The following Russian standards were prepared and put into effect:

  • GOST R 52005-2003.Non-destructive testing. Metal magnetic memory method. General requirements.

  • GOST R 52081-2003.Non-destructive testing. Metal magnetic memory method. Terms and definitions.

  • GOST R 52330-2005.Non-destructive testing. Stressed-strained state test of industrial objects and transport. General requirements.

  • ST RWS 004-03.Non-destructive testing. Welded joints of equipment and constructions. Method of metal magnetic memory.

During the period from 1994 till 2008 42 IIW documents with positive resolutions on the metal magnetic memory method were issued.

The International Standard ISO 24497-1:2007(E), 24497-2:2007(E), 24497-3:2007(E) on the metal magnetic memory method is approved in 2007 as a result of positive voting among 18 IIW member countries and more than 10 ISO Committee countries.

Significant experience of industrial and laboratory investigations, availability of techniques, guidance documents, scientific and technical reports allowed developing the normative-technical documentation (NTD) on certification of the metal magnetic memory method, inspection devices and personnel. Besides the techniques and GD, the normative-technical documentation includes: the requirements to technical knowledge of the experts studying the MMM method; the program of Level I, II and III experts training (approved by the State Engineering Supervision (Rostechnadzor) of Russia); passports and technical specifications to inspection instruments; operating manuals, techniques for inspection instruments calibration and testing; the user's manual to the software for computer processing of results; training handbook.

金属磁记忆检测法新论文:

基础出版物:

1. Dubov A.A., Dubov Al.A., Kolokolnikov S.M. Method of metal magnetic memory and inspection instruments. Training handbook. Moscow: ZAO "TISSO", 2008, 365p.

2. Vlasov V.T., Dubov A.A. Physical theory of the "strain-failure" process. Part I. Physical criteria of metal's limiting states. Moscow: ZAO "TISSO", 2007, 517p.

3. Vlasov V.T., Dubov A.A. Physical bases of the metal magnetic memory method. Moscow: ZAO "TISSO", 2004, 389p.

4. Dubov A.A. I.C. 2029263. Patent of Russia and the C.I.S. countries. Method for residual stresses determination in products made of ferromagnetic materials. List of Inventions, No.5, 1995.

5. Proceedings of the First, the Second, the Third and the Fourth International Scientific-Technical Conferences "Equipment and structures diagnostics using the metal magnetic memory". Papers and summary to papers. Moscow: Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2007.

6. Dubov A.A. Diagnostics of boiler tubes using the metal magnetic memory. Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 1995.

7. Dubov A.A. Diagnostics of turbine equipment using the metal magnetic memory. Moscow: Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd, 1999.

8. Dubov A.A. Diagnostics of pipelines, equipment and structures using the metal magnetic memory. Collection of papers and reports. Moscow: Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd, 2001.

9. Dubov A.A. Investigation of metal properties using the magnetic memory method // Physical metallurgy and thermal treatment of metals, No.9, 1997.

10. Dubov A.A. Express method of welding stresses inspection // Welding fabrication, No.11, 1996.

11. Dubov A.A. Diagnostics of rails fatigue damaging using the metal magnetic memory // In the world of NDT, No.5, 1999.

12. Goritzky V.M., Dubov A.A., Demin E.A. Investigation of steel samples structural damaging using the metal magnetic memory method // Testing. Diagnostics, No.7, 2000.

13. Dubov A.A. The problems of the ageing equipment life assessment // Labour safety in industry, No.12, 2002, pp.30-38.

14. Dubov A.A. The method of metal limiting state determining and equipment life assessment by magnetic diagnostic parameters // Testing. Diagnostics, No.5, 2003.

 
 
俄罗斯动力诊断公司 版权所有 @2009